Thursday, May 03, 2007

Spiderman 3 (or, Spiderman just fuck off)

Last night I was unlucky enough to catch a media screening of the year's first big budget disappointment. Who organises a media screening the night before the movie opens nationally? A distribution company who wants to minimise bad press, that's who.

I loved the other instalments of Spiderman but this one drops the ball so completely that it is laughable. Raimi's latest offering is so threadbare, it makes other comic book films look like Citizen Kane. You know the story, Peter is in love but self-obsessed, MJ is in love but-self pitying and Harry is in love but Peter-obsessed. Add two new villans and a new love interest but don't bother stirring.

There is so much crammed into Spiderman 3 that no time has been left to develop the characters motivations beyond the perfunctory stereotypical response to stimuli. The film pretty much runs itself. It is the tried and true superhero defeats villain, but not really, back he comes - three times over set against a turgid love story. Yawn.

Sorry if this sounds venomous (bad choice of words) but Spiderman 3 just does not deliver. Unfortunately the have greenlit another sequel. Please, please, please don't see this one, it only encourages them.

Labels: , , ,

5 Comments:

At 11:17 am, Blogger cloudcontrol said...

I was worried about this. Any sequel which places Venom (arguably the greatest villain in the Spider-man pantheon) in with Hobgoblin and the sand-guy is a recipe for disaster. They should have just held off on Venom for ep 4, and done the ridiculously cool Venom vs. Carnage story... although that's probably what they're going to do anyway.

 
At 12:12 pm, Blogger Unknown said...

I saw it on thursday night and was hoping that the only thing that was going to be a downer was the screaming kids. How wrong I was!

 
At 7:37 pm, Blogger Steven said...

I enjoyed the Bill Campbell cameo.

The press screenings over here were two weeks before opening day.

 
At 6:34 pm, Blogger Glenn Dunks said...

Oh boy, that WAS terrible. Ugh. Most people in my cinema, it seemed, were restless and fidgetty and didn't like it either. Bah-bow.

 
At 4:56 pm, Blogger Alex Nova said...

It was a good movie, it would be better if the whole Mary Jane character had a small part.

Alex
http://www.attractwomen.com.au

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, January 22, 2007

Daredevil (or, I wish I were blind)


I borrowed the dvd of Daredevil from Glen about, well, long enough back for him to forget I even have it, I'm sure. Actually, I didn't even know that I had it until I returned to Australia to find it snuggled in my tubs of dvds. I borrowed it because when I saw it in the cinema I fell asleep. When I tried to watch it on dvd, I fell asleep. I tried to watch it again and fell asleep.

I've always wanted to see it. I always fall asleep. That has to be somewhat telling.

I watched it again yesterday and found out something even more telling: I have seen Daredevil all the way through. I have seen it all the way through and it still didn't make enough of an impression on me for me to recall that I had seen it.

Why did I persevere? Jennifer Garner. (That reads, Jennifer Garner FULL STOP, by the way!)

I like comic book films and Daredevil came with such good press, pre-release. A dark comic book film. A solid comic book film. No... it was just another lightweight, watered down, connect the dots, crap comic book film.

I'll drop the dvd back to you, Glen. Post haste!

Labels: , , , ,

5 Comments:

At 4:11 pm, Blogger RRP said...

i fell asleep in all FOUR harry potter films... in the cinema and at home.

btw mikey, did you ever see "the avengers"? now, that was crap.

 
At 9:59 pm, Blogger walypala said...

I concur wholeheartedly, The Avengers was complete and utter shite.

I agree semi-heartedly on the Potter films. The third is actually fantastic; the rest are a snore-fest.

 
At 11:29 pm, Blogger richardwatts said...

You mean you didn't like a certain well-hung Irishman's scenery-chewing performance? ;-)

If you think Daredevil is bad, I challenge you to watch Catwoman, Mike - now that's truly awful.

I watched it with a group of straight friends, one of whom said afterwards, shaking his head in disbelief, "Halle Berry's breast = hot. Leather = hot. Helle's breasts in leather should be doubley hot, but this film manages to ruin even that!"

 
At 11:37 pm, Blogger walypala said...

Scenery-chewing is one way of putting it. He was awful!

As for Catwoman, I really want to see how wrong they went. I can't believe they fucked it up so royally when all the ground work had already been done for them.

 
At 10:48 pm, Blogger Lumpen said...

Electra was worse, believe it or not.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home