Thursday, May 03, 2007

Spiderman 3 (or, Spiderman just fuck off)

Last night I was unlucky enough to catch a media screening of the year's first big budget disappointment. Who organises a media screening the night before the movie opens nationally? A distribution company who wants to minimise bad press, that's who.

I loved the other instalments of Spiderman but this one drops the ball so completely that it is laughable. Raimi's latest offering is so threadbare, it makes other comic book films look like Citizen Kane. You know the story, Peter is in love but self-obsessed, MJ is in love but-self pitying and Harry is in love but Peter-obsessed. Add two new villans and a new love interest but don't bother stirring.

There is so much crammed into Spiderman 3 that no time has been left to develop the characters motivations beyond the perfunctory stereotypical response to stimuli. The film pretty much runs itself. It is the tried and true superhero defeats villain, but not really, back he comes - three times over set against a turgid love story. Yawn.

Sorry if this sounds venomous (bad choice of words) but Spiderman 3 just does not deliver. Unfortunately the have greenlit another sequel. Please, please, please don't see this one, it only encourages them.

Labels: , , ,

5 Comments:

At 11:17 am, Blogger cloudcontrol said...

I was worried about this. Any sequel which places Venom (arguably the greatest villain in the Spider-man pantheon) in with Hobgoblin and the sand-guy is a recipe for disaster. They should have just held off on Venom for ep 4, and done the ridiculously cool Venom vs. Carnage story... although that's probably what they're going to do anyway.

 
At 12:12 pm, Blogger Unknown said...

I saw it on thursday night and was hoping that the only thing that was going to be a downer was the screaming kids. How wrong I was!

 
At 7:37 pm, Blogger Steven said...

I enjoyed the Bill Campbell cameo.

The press screenings over here were two weeks before opening day.

 
At 6:34 pm, Blogger Glenn Dunks said...

Oh boy, that WAS terrible. Ugh. Most people in my cinema, it seemed, were restless and fidgetty and didn't like it either. Bah-bow.

 
At 4:56 pm, Blogger Alex Nova said...

It was a good movie, it would be better if the whole Mary Jane character had a small part.

Alex
http://www.attractwomen.com.au

 

Post a Comment

<< Home